For what it’s worth, I’ve built equipment for meteorology to NASA prints. It was all about science, not politics. I can’t speak to anything else for which they may or may not be used .
Can’t disagree. I don’t even know if it can be brought under control, but out there it’s like “your machine vs. our machine.” For our own safety it has to be there. Better believe it needs fixed.
As you wish. Even if their research was corrupted, I see no political connection to the investigation of gravitational anomalies. It’s a great mystery. For reference, though:
NASA is more independent.
For what it’s worth, I’ve built equipment for meteorology to NASA prints. It was all about science, not politics. I can’t speak to anything else for which they may or may not be used .
Can’t disagree. I don’t even know if it can be brought under control, but out there it’s like “your machine vs. our machine.” For our own safety it has to be there. Better believe it needs fixed.
As you wish. Even if their research was corrupted, I see no political connection to the investigation of gravitational anomalies. It’s a great mystery. For reference, though:
https://science.howstuffworks.com/nasa1.htm
I didn’t work for NASA. I worked a project NASA funded.
If anything, a reason for rising seas other than climate change would seem to diminish the climate change narrative.
You would not actually believe all that NASA does. It’s mostly research, and as far as I’m concerned they’re awesome 👍